Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pedro Sakamoto vs Leonardo Civita-Telles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sakamoto vs Civita-Telles analysis and find out who is favored!
Pedro Sakamoto vs Leonardo Civita-Telles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sakamoto 1 - 0 Civita-Telles
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sakamoto has won 47.12% of points on their second serve, while Civita-Telles has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sakamoto, in recent form, has won 53.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Civita-Telles has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.15% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sakamoto has saved 55.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Civita-Telles has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sakamoto has won 60% of matches played (W/L 42/ 28), with Civita-Telles winning 71.43% (W/L 15/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sakamoto has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 370/ 270), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 31/ 34). Civita-Telles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 44/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Sakamoto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26), where as Civita-Telles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 15/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sakamoto winning 1 times and Civita-Telles being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sakamoto winning 2 and Civita-Telles winning 0. The last match between Sakamoto and Civita-Telles was at the M25 Lajeado, 12-10-2023, Second, Clay with Pedro Sakamoto getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sakamoto and Civita-Telles have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sakamoto winning 0 times and Civita-Telles 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sakamoto winning 0, and Civita-Telles 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sakamoto has played against opponents with an average rank of 308.24 while Civita-Telles has played against players with an average rank of 73.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sakamoto has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Civita-Telles has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sakamoto has converted 49.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Civita-Telles has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
302
Rank
284
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (403-306)
Career Total W/L
57% (83-63)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$20,740
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sakamoto VS Civita-Telles H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Pedro Sakamoto | Leonardo Civita-Telles |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (45/63) | 46% (24/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (34/45) | 75% (18/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 54% (15/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (19/52) | 30% (19/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sakamoto VS Civita-Telles H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Leonardo Civita-Telles
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pedro Sakamoto | Leonardo Civita-Telles |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (29/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (245/223) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 52% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 243.64 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (869/1442) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (563/869) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (270/573) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (77/157) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (599/1391) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Pedro Sakamoto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Luis Queiroz Miguel
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Fernandez
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
16
Total Points Won
12
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Leonardo Civita-Telles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Leonardo Civita-Telles
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
11
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Civita-Telles
Player
Jake Bhangdia
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Bruna
Player
Leonardo Civita-Telles
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sakamoto Vs Civita-Telles Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Pedro Sakamoto
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
